it appears that they calculate the square acreage of flood damage in New Orleans (that map seems geographically reasonable). And then drew a circular overlay with that same volume, just to give some minor idea of how much ground area would be flooded.
Obviously Witchita would have more area underwater than Denver. The kind of software and time it would take to write a webpage that allows you to arbitrarily enter any city and get a topo accurate flood image is just silly.
It may well be, but I think the point is that scaring people with stuff that's not going to happen is not a great idea. There are enough bad things in the world that can happen that I don't think we really need to load ourselves up with extra boogeymen.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-10 02:17 pm (UTC)Obviously Witchita would have more area underwater than Denver. The kind of software and time it would take to write a webpage that allows you to arbitrarily enter any city and get a topo accurate flood image is just silly.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-10 03:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-10 04:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-10 07:45 pm (UTC)And yet ...